Neutralising the Norm-hunters GM James Howell From "Kingpin" No. 26; Reprinted with permission. Becoming a GM does have its pluses but the major disadvantage I've found is the sudden disappearance of 95% of my motivation. The only thing that really gets me going nowadays is the prospect of stopping some unfortunate who's going for a norm. This is not a trait on which I have a monopoly: I can even remember mild- mannered John Nunn making a similar comment. Make the norm- hunter a Russian and I start foaming at the mouth, so the reader can imagine that during the following game I was feeling particularly rabid: my opponent needed a draw for his second GM norm. James Howell-Alexander Volzhin Calcutta 1996 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bc4 Nf6 4 Ng5 My current pet-line. I got sick of players preparing main-line Spanishes against me knowing that they could confidently predict my first 20 moves. 4...d5 5 exd5 b5 Never faced this one before but fortunately I'd done some homework on it. 6 Bf1 h6 7 Nxf7!? Not highly thought of by theory but the games Ellison G.Flear, Isle of Man 1994 and Gretarsson Hebden, Kopavogur 1994 had come to my attention. In both cases the White players had played 7 Nxf7 and easily reached winning positions against their illustrious opponents. 7...Kxf7 8 dxc6 Bc5 9 Be2 Ne4! (See Diagram) Glenn played the uninspiring 9...Qd5 and ended up a pawn down for nothing. 10 0-0 Bxf2+! After 10...Rf8 11 d4 exd4 12 Nd2 Mark's compensation for the pawn was also nebulous. 11 Rxf2 Nxf2 12 Qf1! 12 Kxf2 Qd4+ 13 Kf1 Rf8 looks suicidal. My opponent must have been appalled at the course of the game since this is not the sort of position you want when desperately needing a draw. 12...Rf8 13 Qxf2+ Kg8 14 Qe3 Qh4 Clearly there is no time for shilly-shallying Qe1 mate is Black's only conceivable threat. White can force an immediate draw with 15 Qg3 Qd4+ 16 Qe3 Qh4 17 Qg3 but I calculated 15 g3 Qh3 16 d3 Bg4 17 Nd2! Rf5 18 Bf1 consolidating and bashed out my move. In retrospect 15 Bxb5!? (Volzhin) might have been better but I rejected it as being too cheeky White is already quite enough material up without grabbing apparently irrelevant pawns. 15 g3 Qf6! Whoops! Now Black's bishop is coming to h3. I wasn't going to tell my opponent in the post-mortem, but I completely missed this move. Retreats really are much, much harder to see than blatantly aggressive moves. 16 d3 Fortunately I'm still on the board but in a state of shock. What made it potentially even more embarrassing was that this (round 9) was my first outing on the demo. boards and since this was my first big tournament as a GM I was very keen to live up to my newly acquired status. 16...Bh3 17 Nd2 The only sensible way to defend against mate. At least the onus is on Black to find a way through now. (See Diagram) 17...Rf7? Seductive but inaccurate. The correct way to triple on the f-file was demonstrated afterwards by the inimitable Jonathan Speelman: 17...e4!! 18 d4 (White has to keep the position closed) Rad8! and now 19 c3 Rd5 and 20...Rf5 is very dangerous so White should probably bale out with 19 b3 Qxd4 20 Qxd4 Rxd4 21 Nf1 Bxf1 22 Be3 leading to a drawn ending. 18 b3 Qxc6 Because 18...Raf8 is effectively answered by 19 Ba3 Volzhin decides to grab material while he still can. 19 Ne4 Qxc2 20 Ba3 a5 21 Bc5 Establishing firm control, or so I thought when I made the move. However, a few seconds afterwards I suffered my second coronary of the game when I noticed that 21...Qb2 would wipe out most of my queenside. It turned out afterwards that my opponent had avoided this because of 22 Re1 Qxa2 23 g4 picking up the stranded bishop. I tend to support his view. 21...Be6 22 Qd2 A third and possibly fatal heart attack seemed less likely with the queens off. 22...Qxd2 23 Nxd2 a4 I spent ages wondering how to win the position after 24 b4 a3 the a2 pawn is a very serious weakness when I suddenly realised that there was a much simpler solution. 24 bxa4 Rxa4 25 a3 Whether it's deserved or not White's position is now completely winning - Black has no counterplay and can only sit tight whilst his GM norm goes down the drain. 25...Rd7 26 Rc1 Bg4 27 Bf1 Bf5 28 Rc3 c6 29 Bb4 Ra6 30 Kf2 Be6 31 Ke3 Bd5 32 Nf3 Rf7 33 Be2 Bxf3 34 Bxf3 Rf6 35 Rc5 1-0 Quite apart from having a depressingly hopeless position, Black was about to lose on time. However, this isn't the end of the story. My opponent took his defeat with equanimity, behaved like a complete gentleman in the post-mortem and won crushingly the following day to make a 10- round GM norm. My round 10 game, on the other hand, was reported thus in the Indian "Telegraph": "Howell, playing with intentions of a draw from the beginning, rapidly traded pieces expecting it to simplify his task, but did not realise that the concessions he made by ignoring natural development of his forces would cost him the game. Dolmatov converted his lead in development into material supremacy, and won without much difficulty." Needless to say my impressions of the game don't quite tally with this account (but even so I don't intend to let the readers of "Kingpin" see it). The Chess Cafe would like to extend its thanks to "Kingpin" and James Howell for permission to reprint the above article. "Kingpin" is a humorous chess magazine which contains entertaining and instructive articles by masters on all aspects of the game. Regular features include: IM Gary Lane's "Agony" Column, GM Nigel Davies - "The Voice of Reason," "Great Swindles of Our Time," "Hack Attack," and Edward Winter's "Forum." 'The joy of chess is nowhere celebrated to such climactic excesses as in "Kingpin"...' IM William Hartston, "The Independent" Annual subscription (3 issues) - UK: œ8.00 Europe: œ10.00 USA/RoW: œ12.00 Cheques made payable to Kingpin should be sent to: 27 Quebec Road, Ilford, Essex IG1 4TT, ENGLAND. Or, you may contact "Kingpin" directly via e-mail: Jon_Manley@msn.com.